Case Study 2: Health Insurer Violates Whistleblower Act

Question Answered step-by-step Case Study 2: Health Insurer Violates Whistleblower ActHealth Net, California’s fourth-largest health insurer, has agreed to pay $340,000 for violating securities laws on whistleblower awards. Since 2010, Health Net used illegal severance agreements to require employees to waive their ability to collect whistleblower awards in their departing severance agreements. This prevented any departing employees from speaking to state and federal officials about company violations. Although Health Net did not admit or deny the findings, it agreed to pay the penalty and contact all employees who had signed the severance agreements between August 12, 2011, and October 22, 2015, to inform them that they were not prohibited from exercising their rights as whistleblowers.21. Which specific law did Health Net violate when it required its departing employees to sign the severance agreement?2. Why is it important for employees to be able to exercise their right as whistleblowers?3. What would happen if Health Net terminated a patient who acted as a whistleblower? Health Science Science Nursing DDER 6678 Share QuestionEmailCopy link Comments (0)