Posts

Dissertation Methodology | Chapter 3: Research Methodology

How to Write a Dissertation Methodology | Chapter 3: Research Methodology

Writing a dissertation methodology involves elucidating the intended actions or research techniques employed in your study. When part of the dissertation proposal, it’s articulated in the future tense, shifting to past tense in the finalized dissertation post actual research. This crucial chapter expounds on the philosophical foundations of chosen research methods, justifying their selection with clear academic reasoning tied to existing literature. The dissertation methodology typically encompasses the following sections.

Structure of a Dissertation Methodology:

Introduction

Initiating the dissertation methodology requires a concise introduction, spotlighting the investigated research problem, purpose, overarching research methodology, and chapter organization. Restating research questions and hypotheses may also be fitting in this section.

Research Design

This section delves into an intricate explanation of the chosen research philosophy, paradigm, and overall research approach, warranting their preference over alternative methodologies. Common research paradigms include positivism, constructivist/interpretivism, critical/transformative, and pragmatic. Research approaches span quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-method research. The section also mandates the identification, explanation, and justification of the specific research design, divulging its advantages and drawbacks. Recognized research designs entail experimental, quasi-experimental, survey, causal-comparative, action research, case study, and phenomenological study. Definitions of dependent, independent, or moderating variables are crucial, accompanied by reasons for their study. This section might also encompass the conceptual framework if not covered in the introduction.

Population and Sample

This segment necessitates the identification and depiction of the study’s target population, detailing its characteristics. The population forms the basis for sample extraction, and the sampling frame, technique, and the actual sample size must be clearly elucidated with sound academic justifications. Probability and non-probability sampling methods (e.g., simple random sampling, stratified random sampling, purposive sampling) should be distinctly addressed, grounding the choice in the research’s context.

Data Collection Methods and Instrumentation

Here, the chosen methods for data collection (e.g., surveys, interviews, focus groups, observations) and corresponding instruments (e.g., questionnaires, interview protocols) demand an explicit description. Instruments must align with research objectives or questions, and details should cover standardization, structure, nature of items, scales, scoring procedures, validity, reliability, and administration protocols.

5 Data Collection Methods
  • Surveys, quizzes, and questionnaires.
  • Interviews.
  • Focus groups.
  • Direct observations.
  • Documents and records (and other types of secondary data, which won’t be our main focus here)

Data Collection Procedures

This segment necessitates a meticulous account of data collection procedures, encompassing pilot studies and actual research procedures. Clarity is paramount for replicability, ensuring another researcher can emulate the procedures for similar conclusions. A comprehensive overview includes the design and development of research instruments, pilot testing, scheduling, distribution, collection, timing, and participant instructions.

Data Analysis Methods

This section identifies and elucidates the techniques for data analysis, specifying the analytical framework’s variability in tackling distinct research questions. For qualitative data, methods like thematic analysis, content analysis, narrative analysis, and discourse analysis may be highlighted. Quantitative data analysis involves descriptive (e.g., frequencies, measures of central tendency, measures of central dispersion) and inferential statistics (e.g., correlation, regression, analysis of variance). Tools such as Excel, SPSS, STATA, R, or SAS should be mentioned, alongside how data will be presented.

Chapter Summary

Concluding the methodology chapter involves summarizing key discussed points. Additionally, a seamless introduction to the subsequent chapter may be incorporated, providing an overview of what will be covered in the findings chapter.

Expert Assistance with Dissertation Methodology

Navigating the intricacies of choosing a methodology and research methods for a dissertation can be challenging. While supervisors or dissertation chairs may provide general guidance, specific uncertainties may persist. Consulting standard research method textbooks or seeking guidance from a research methodology expert can be beneficial. Onlinefreelancersnetwork offers reliable support in structuring your research methodology, ensuring alignment with research questions, objectives, and existing literature. Our experts aid in developing the conceptual framework to map out variable relationships, facilitating the selection of the best research approach. We assist in choosing and discussing appropriate research methods, providing academic rationale for each choice and linking it to relevant literature. For assistance in crafting your dissertation’s third chapter, feel free to contact us. Our services are affordable, available 24/7, and our adept writers are ready to assist. We guide you through the data collection process, covering interviews, questionnaire administration, focus groups, observations, and the gathering of secondary data.

Briefly explain the environment in which the use of PESTEL (G) would be applicable. Your explanation should be supported by examples from the case study.

Briefly explain the environment in which the use of PESTEL (G) would
be applicable. Your explanation should be supported by examples from
the case
study.

Identify the main strategic leaders involved in the company’s operations and decision making. Use examples from the case study.

Identify the main strategic leaders involved in the
company’s operations and decision making. Use examples from the case
study.

Discuss how did Unilever exercise Strategic leadership. Provide examples from the case study.

Discuss how did Unilever exercise Strategic leadership.
Provide examples from the case study.

Identify the main strategic leaders involved in the company’s operations and decision making. Use examples from the case study

Identify the main strategic leaders involved in the company’s operations and decision making. Use examples from the case study

This report is inductive research that mainly involves finding observation patterns and developing explanations (theories) for these patterns through a series of objectives. There is already research available in the internet I have attached to this submission. It contains all what this report needs. All the headings are relevant to our report. What is my requirement is to create a new report with similar concept but some modification/relocation of headings order/paraphrasing, etc. However, it is preferable to use different references than the one used in the existing research Please find below special requirements on how to structure the report Specific requirements: (structure of the report) Abstract: An overview of the report Introduction: 1- Outline of the relevance/importance of the chosen topic. 2- Announce what you want to do and how you will make it Theoretical Background: 1- To review some relevant articles and books and summaries the main ideas in your own words. 2- The minimum references to be used is eight references Conclusions and Recommendations -summary/ overview of key issues and arguments -explain what you learnt from the project in terms of relevance of theory and practice References – You must provide eight references used in your project (APA) format.

This report is inductive research that mainly involves finding observation patterns and developing explanations (theories) for these patterns through a series of objectives.

There is already research available in the internet I have attached to this submission. It contains all what this report needs. All the headings are relevant to our report. What is my requirement is to create a new report with similar concept but some modification/relocation of headings order/paraphrasing, etc.
However, it is preferable to use different references than the one used in the existing research

Please find below special requirements on how to structure the report

Specific requirements: (structure of the report)

Abstract: An overview of the report

Introduction:
1- Outline of the relevance/importance of the chosen topic.
2- Announce what you want to do and how you will make it

Theoretical Background:
1- To review some relevant articles and books and summaries the main ideas in your own words.
2- The minimum references to be used is eight references

Conclusions and Recommendations
-summary/ overview of key issues and arguments
-explain what you learnt from the project in terms of relevance of theory and practice

References
– You must provide eight references used in your project (APA) format.

Discuss 3 changes/elements of the reforms from the case study on Cook Islands and explain how they are linked to NPM. Clearly identify your reforms by numbering them from 1 to 3 and starting each one of them on a new line. For each reform, mention what is the change/aspect you are discussing/analyzing, explain what this reform implies and finally, support your point by explaining how the current case fits NPM. Use points from the case study, but explain them in your own words. (12 points)

Discuss 3 changes/elements of the reforms from the case study on
Cook Islands and explain how they are linked to NPM. Clearly identify
your reforms by numbering them from 1 to 3 and starting each one of
them on a new line. For each reform, mention what is the change/aspect
you are discussing/analyzing, explain what this reform implies and
finally, support your point by explaining how the current case fits
NPM. Use points from the case study, but explain them in your own
words. (12 points)

Case study questions 1. Do you agree with Ramsey’s comment that a successful merger is 10% planning and 90% communication? Why or why not? (10 marks) 2. Refer to exhibit 1.1 and 1.2 and analyze how you as a hired consultant will choose which employees from exhibit 2 should be made redundant and why. Provide detailed explanation for your answer. (15 marks) Specific requirements: 600 words per question

Case study questions
1. Do you agree with Ramsey’s comment that a successful merger is 10% planning and 90% communication? Why or why not? (10 marks)
2. Refer to exhibit 1.1 and 1.2 and analyze how you as a hired consultant will choose which employees from exhibit 2 should be made redundant and why. Provide detailed explanation for your answer. (15 marks)

Specific requirements: 600 words per question

Analyzing the case study

  1. Read the case study attentively at least two or three times. Become familiar with the key points of the situation without adopting a position on the case. Read as carefully and objectively as you can.
  2. After becoming thoroughly familiar with the case, make notes regarding the main issues as you see them.
  3. Since, you are also the writer of the case, the above two steps can be skipped.
  4. Identify two or three main problems from your case.
  5. Identify alternative solutions to the above-identified problems. Describe several alternatives, existing constraints and explain why some alternative solutions rejected.
  6. Solution – provide one or more realistic solution to the problem; explain the reasons behind the proposed solution; support this solution with justification and include relevant theoretical concepts
  7. Recommendations – identify specific strategies to accomplish the proposed solution; recommend further actions; outline an implementation plan.
  8. References: Your list of references citing articles, reports or any online resources.

The case study analysis and writing must be 15 to 20 pages in length (not more than 30 pages, APA 6 or 7 format, and 12-point Times New Roman font with 1-inch margins) excluding bibliography, table of contents, graphics, tabular or illustrative material. Projects turned in after due date are considered late. 2.5 points deducted for each day the project is late. Special circumstances need to be discussed with the instructor ahead of time when possible. The due date for this exercise is July 21st, 2020.

Some references:

https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/research/Documents/Shapiro-Participating-in-a-Case-Study.pdf

https://student.unsw.edu.au/writing-case-study-report-engineering

https://www.westernsydney.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/1082474/Case_Study_Structure.pdf

http://www.streetofwalls.com/finance-training-courses/consulting-case-study-training/consulting-case-study-types/

https://www.unb.ca/fredericton/studentservices/_resources/pdfs/wss/casestudyanalysis.pdf