Question Answered step-by-step The purpose of this qualitative article: This study aims to… The purpose of this qualitative article:This study aims to delineate a nurses’ perception of their experiences with interruptions during hand-off at the bedside in critical care units and learn more about the number, type, and source of the disruption during bedside report (BSR). The target population:Nurses practicing BSR in critical care units.Study methodology:The method used was a descriptive design, where one hundred nurse hand-offs were observed. The observation data was then analyzed using descriptive statistics and quantitative and qualitative content. Results of the study:The study revealed that most nurses did not mind interruptions because, in most occurrences, the interruptions were from the receiving nurse who is asking clarifying questions regarding the patient. Moreover, the study also revealed that interruptions during hand-off, such as unrelated topics, could result in unsafe patient care. Nevertheless, it was concluded that whether an interruption during hand-off was considered a disruption was dependent on how the receiver is mindfully and actively participating to gain knowledge from the hand-off. Limitations:All the staff on the study units were aware of the study; therefore, the staff may have been hesitant to interrupt during BSR, which would not represent usual practice. The number of observations performed was small and done in a single hospital unit, making it hard to argue that it pertains to all nurses and settings. Lastly, the BSR observations were done during the usual shift change times, which limits our understanding of what type of impact interruptions have during hand-off at other times during the shift. Conclusion: This study gave us a better understanding of the perception of hand-off at the bedside from both sending and receiving critical care nurses. It was concluded that whether an interruption during hand-off was considered a disruption was dependent on how the receiver is mindfully and actively participating to gain knowledge from the hand-off. Shared understanding through conversation was essential to the nurses in the study. Most importantly, nurses recognized the impact that interruptions have on patient safety. An interruption can commonly be perceived as a negative action, yet in BSR, it is a benefit that adds to the quality of patient care.According to Nieswiadomy & Bailey (2017), the individual’s perspective is more important in qualitative research, whereas quantitative research focuses more on numbers and groups of interest. Through this study, I have learned that BSR must be a two-way conversation to share an understanding of what is happening with your patients. It also provides both outgoing and incoming nurses the opportunity to assess the patient and their environment together. Health Science Science Nursing Share QuestionEmailCopy link Comments (0)

Question Answered step-by-step The purpose of this qualitative article: This study aims to… The purpose of this qualitative article:This study aims to delineate a nurses’ perception of their experiences with interruptions during hand-off at the bedside in critical care units and learn more about the number, type, and source of the disruption during bedside report (BSR). The target population:Nurses practicing BSR in critical care units.Study methodology:The method used was a descriptive design, where one hundred nurse hand-offs were observed. The observation data was then analyzed using descriptive statistics and quantitative and qualitative content. Results of the study:The study revealed that most nurses did not mind interruptions because, in most occurrences, the interruptions were from the receiving nurse who is asking clarifying questions regarding the patient. Moreover, the study also revealed that interruptions during hand-off, such as unrelated topics, could result in unsafe patient care. Nevertheless, it was concluded that whether an interruption during hand-off was considered a disruption was dependent on how the receiver is mindfully and actively participating to gain knowledge from the hand-off. Limitations:All the staff on the study units were aware of the study; therefore, the staff may have been hesitant to interrupt during BSR, which would not represent usual practice. The number of observations performed was small and done in a single hospital unit, making it hard to argue that it pertains to all nurses and settings. Lastly, the BSR observations were done during the usual shift change times, which limits our understanding of what type of impact interruptions have during hand-off at other times during the shift. Conclusion: This study gave us a better understanding of the perception of hand-off at the bedside from both sending and receiving critical care nurses. It was concluded that whether an interruption during hand-off was considered a disruption was dependent on how the receiver is mindfully and actively participating to gain knowledge from the hand-off. Shared understanding through conversation was essential to the nurses in the study. Most importantly, nurses recognized the impact that interruptions have on patient safety. An interruption can commonly be perceived as a negative action, yet in BSR, it is a benefit that adds to the quality of patient care.According to Nieswiadomy & Bailey (2017), the individual’s perspective is more important in qualitative research, whereas quantitative research focuses more on numbers and groups of interest. Through this study, I have learned that BSR must be a two-way conversation to share an understanding of what is happening with your patients. It also provides both outgoing and incoming nurses the opportunity to assess the patient and their environment together. Health Science Science Nursing Share QuestionEmailCopy link Comments (0)