Peer Response below: Reason: Poor grammar does not define a person…
Question Answered step-by-step Peer Response below: Reason: Poor grammar does not define a person… Peer Response below: Reason: Poor grammar does not define a person as unintelligent or inattentive and has nothing to do with a person’s work ethic. Quote:”A weak writer is not necessarily a weak reader, especially if the person has English as a second language; for non-native speakers, comprehending written English comes more easily than writing it. And the applicant whose writing seems scattered, or halting may be fully fluent in visual media or social skills.” (Haussamen, 2012, p.1)Paraphrased: Non-native speakers of English understand the language better than writing it. Someone who has poor grammar does not indicate they have poor comprehensive skills. They might have better skills in other areas such as visual media or social skills. (Haussamen, 2012)Explanation:The quote supports my reason because it provides the reader with an example of how poor grammar does not mean poor intelligence with the example of a non-native speaker. Most non-native speakers find it easier to understand than to write in English, but the fact they are able to comprehend another language shows the level of intelligence they have. The quote also informs the reader that someone with poor grammar skills tends to have excellent social skills and is fully fluent in visual media. These examples show the reader that grammar does not correlate with intelligence or bad work ethics. Reference:Haussamen, B. (2012, August 13). What good writing indicates, and doesn’t. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2012/08/13/is-our-children-learning-enough-grammar-to-get-hired/what-good-writing-indicates-and-doesnt Respond to peer response above and provide feedback on her/his reason and quote. Here are a few things you might consider when writing your response:Is the reason clear and logical? Why or why not? Suggest possible revisions to make the reason clear and logical.Does the selected quote relate to the reason? If so, how? If not, why not? Suggest an alternative quote that better relates to the reason.Is the paraphrase of the quote effective? If so, how? If not, why not? Suggest possible revisions to improve the paraphrase.Is the connection between the quote and the reason clear and logical? Why or why not? Suggest possible revisions to make the connection clear and logical.What other insight or suggestions might you offer your classmate regarding her/his topic, thesis, and reasons? Arts & Humanities Writing WRTG 111 Share QuestionEmailCopy link Comments (0)
