For your FIRST POSTING, you should: Read the Secondary Source essay…

Question Answered step-by-step For your FIRST POSTING, you should: Read the Secondary Source essay… For your FIRST POSTING, you should:Read the Secondary Source essay titled, “The 1912 Oregon Voters’ Pamphlet “For” and “Against” Arguments for the Woman Suffrage Ballot Measure.”http://centuryofaction.org/index.php/main_site/document_project/the_1912_oregon_voters_pamphlet_for_and_against_arguments_for_the_woman_sufIn one short paragraph, summarize the Secondary Source essay.Read the Oregon Voter’s Pamphlet, Pages 4-9.Reflect on each of the following questions about the Oregon Voter’s Pamphlet:Each group chose a different tone and style for their argument. How might this have affected the way male voters read and understood their major points?Given that only men could vote, why do you think the members of the Oregon State Association Opposed to the Extension of Suffrage to Women argued that defeats in previous elections proved that “woman suffrage is not wanted in Oregon, either by the women or by the men”? What do you think they meant when referring to “the women who are doing women’s work in the world” on page 6?What do you think the members of the Oregon State Association Opposed to the Extension of Suffrage to Women meant by their assertion that “the vast majority of women are represented by household suffrage” in their point number 5? Do you agree with their next point that “the women not so represented suffer no practical injustice which giving the suffrage will remedy”?My idea:According to the secondary source, the debate about whether or not women should be allowed to vote on November 5th, 1912 was reduced to a pamphlet. Gender equality, democracy, and human rights were all at stake. Not only was women’s suffrage at issue, but also its influence on society, the American government as an example of democracy and human rights.On pages 4-5, it was highlighted that Oregon is surrounded by states that enable women to exercise their right to vote. Therefore there is no reason for Oregon to deny women the same right. Although the reasons are brief, they rely primarily on an empathic tone to persuade voters, particularly male voters, to allow women to vote. Those opposed to women voting used strong and direct language to make their case. It continued on pages 7-8 with arguments like women should not leave their group and that they are indirectly voting by influencing their husbands. Between 1900 and 1910, there was a rise in the number of voters who opposed suffrage for women. This is because they feel that women, particularly married couples, significantly affect decisions. As a result, this alone is obvious and direct proof that women do not want to be granted the power to vote, even if indirectly through their husbands. Also, on page 6, I think it means women’s “nurturing” responsibility toward children and families.I disagree with their next point because if they are not experiencing any actual injustice due to their inability to vote, then why don’t they provide women the right to vote? Also, because the pamphlet claims that men and women are companions, granting women the right to vote completes the function of companionship between men and women. —–> Only this Part I need helpFor your SECOND POSTING, you should:Read the summaries and reflections from the other students;Select one student to respond to and comment on:How the summary and reflections they wrote in their FIRST POSTING either supports the summary and reflections you drew in your first post or contradicts them, being sure to explain why you believe that is the case; andDiscuss why you think the “For” argument ultimately prevailed in Oregon.Peer’s idea:Whether women should or should not vote was a big talking point. The Oregon Voters Pamphlet of November 5th, 1912 for the election provided information for both sides. There were two main groups, the Oregon State Equal Suffrage Association stated that the surrounding states could vote so why couldn’t they, and that voting was a part of democracy so women must be included. The other group was the Oregon State Associations Opposed to the Extension of Suffrage they believed that men and women had their roles. Women were to stay home with the children while the men go out and work.Each document was created with the intent to persuade the male voter to either be in favor of the women’s right to vote or oppose this idea. They both focused on different points. The first one supports women’s right to vote, saying that it is a corrupt democracy if women are unable to vote. The second one opposing the idea of women’s vote goes into that males and females both have their roles so there would be no purpose for women to vote. I think that some believed that women’s vote was unwanted by men and women because they were going under the assumption that the married couples’ vote was accounting for both of their opinions so their thought process was that there was no point in women’s vote because it would be the same as their husbands. When it says women are doing women’s work it means that the male and females had different roles. The males were expected to go out into the workforce meanwhile the women were expected to stay home and care for the children. I don’t agree, because the opposing viewpoint goes into great detail that men and women have completely different roles, so it would be an incorrect assumption that women influence the male’s view of whether women should have the right to vote. History US History HIST MISC Share QuestionEmailCopy link Comments (0)