Evaluate the following arguments. In your evaluation, state whether the argument is inductive or deductive, value or empirical, contains a fallacy or not (stipulate which fallacy it contains if it does) and whether it is valid/invalid or sound/unsound. Then map (or diagram) the argument. Argument: [When liberals engage ideological conservatives, the charge of a misjudgement of truth often arises against the liberals.] – a. [But conservatives cannot adjudicate what truth is, though they would hold that truth is contained within their arguments.] – b. [This is no different than anyone stipulating that they prefer potatoes over pap!] – c. [The choice lies merely in the preference.] – d. [Thus, even conservatives are relativists.] – e.

Evaluate the following arguments. In your evaluation, state whether
the argument is inductive or deductive, value or empirical, contains a
fallacy or not (stipulate which fallacy it contains if it does) and
whether it is valid/invalid or sound/unsound. Then map (or diagram)
the argument.

Argument:

[When liberals engage ideological conservatives, the charge of a
misjudgement of truth often arises against the liberals.] – a. [But
conservatives cannot adjudicate what truth is, though they would hold
that truth is contained within their arguments.] – b. [This is no
different than anyone stipulating that they prefer potatoes over pap!]
– c. [The choice lies merely in the preference.] – d. [Thus, even
conservatives are relativists.] – e.