Choose 1 Quality Childcare program Assignment Attached Files:…

/in /by

Question Answered step-by-step Choose 1 Quality Childcare program Assignment Attached Files:… Choose 1 Quality Childcare program AssignmentAttached Files: Looking at Safe, Appropriate Environments (1) (1).docx Looking at Safe, Appropriate Environments (1) (1).docx – Alternative Formats (2.681 MB) Picture 1 (1).png (722.481 KB) Picture 2 (1).png (321.942 KB) Picture 3 (1).png (255.144 KB) Picture 4 (1).png (1.414 MB) Picture 5 (1).png (94.722 KB) Picture 6 (1).png (865.947 KB) Picture 7 (1).png (526.036 KB) Choice #1  Understanding Quality-Comparing Child Care programsAssignment GuidelinesIt is important that you know how to check on a center’s star rating.  You need to make yourself familiar with the North Carolina Division of Child Development and Early Education (NCDCDEE).  There are many valuable resources in the NCDCDEE website.  For this assignment:Go to the site above. On the top right, click on the ‘Search for Child Care’ tab.  Choose your county; then click submit at the bottom of the page. Choose four Child Care Centers from the page. For each of the centers that you choose, complete the following steps and gather the following information.Go to the 5th tab at the top and click DCDEE Visits. Choose the last visit.  (To double check that you are in the right place, click on this NCDCDEE violation link.)Review the violation/s; then go to the NAEYC Code of Ethical Conduct. https://www.naeyc.org/resources/position-statements/ethical-conductFind 2 Ideals or Principles that address this violation.  Your assignment should include the following information:The name and address of your centerThe date of the violationThe violation2 Ideals or Principles from the Code of Ethics that you believe address the violation.  BE sure to include the number and the actual Ideal/Principle.A detailed justification of why you believe the Ideal/Principles that you chose address the violationChoice #2 Assignment Title: Looking at Safe, Appropriate Environments  Objective: Students will be able to identify essential elements of a good learning environment and be able to recognize how environments should vary for children at different stages of development.  Choose 4 of the images that are attached to this assignment.Answer the following questions for each of the images/photos that you choose:1.  Which age group do you think this environment serves? 2.  What five elements about the environment do you find most appealing to that specific age group? 3.  What would you change if this were your classroom or childcare center? Why? 4.  How many interest areas or leaning centers do you see in the photo? 5.  Do you believe the environment is inviting and safe, based on the picture? Explain. 6. What materials do you see and are there any materials that you would add to enhance the environment for the children?   Be sure that all questions from above are answered for each of the pictures you choose. Make sure that response are written with details, neatly and using proper spelling  and full sentence structure.       Social Science Psychology EDU 119 Share QuestionEmailCopy link Comments (0)

You might also like
The epidemiology related to kleptomania includes which of the...
At this moment in time, what do you feel is the greatest threat to the field of nursing?
A car insurance company is willing to offer accident-free drivers a...
What are the 5 examples of the industry uses of AAS. Explain each...
In relation to your chosen topic (low birthweight) how does this framework advocate for children and families?
Find the value of k so that the line containing the points (1,k)...
Question Answered step-by-step A female patient is brought into the emergency room. On exam, youfind stridor and hives on her face. In which order would you conduct the following?(a)Assess allergies (b)Administer Benadryl(c)Administer Oxygen (d)Administer epinephrine Health Science Science Nursing NRSG 3420 Share QuestionEmailCopy link Comments (0)
The five principles of high-reliability organizations are described in The Milbank Quarterly as pre-occupation of failure, resist the temptation to simplify, sensitivity to operations, commitment to resilience, and a deference to expertise (CHASSIN & LOEB, 2013). In the situation described by the prompt, more information is necessary to determine if this happened at a high-reliability organization. There are some things that indicate that the principles were followed, such as the problems being identified, and the team replacing glucose monitors with what was believed to be higher quality equipment. These two facts seem to follow the pre-occupation of failure and sensitivity to operations. The pre-occupation of failure may have been considered when the machines were changed, in an effort to improve data management in glucose monitoring. The sensitivity to operations happened when the problems were found and reported. A deference to expertise is difficult to judge because there is no information describing the expertise of the team. If the team was made up of people who work with the blood glucose monitoring equipment, then they did defer to expertise. It is also possible that the people working with the glucose equipment were reluctant to change in which case there was not a deference to expertise. Another factor that is unknown, is the quantity of people that were treated in the two weeks and the accuracy of the previous machines. An article in the Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology found that in continuous glucose monitoring machines true hypoglycemia was alerted 92% of the time (Bailey et al., 2014). Maybe 50 incorrectly treated patients in two weeks is still an improvement over the old system. One thing that perhaps should have been done initially is only change one machine and monitor it to watch out for problems. That would limit the number of patients who received inappropriate insulin management. Perhaps the new machine could be monitored by the old machine to ensure that no patients received the wrong care. An article in the Healthcare Management Forum describes evidence-based leadership as the driver of change to a high-reliability organization (Cochrane et al., 2017). It would be interesting to know if the change made to the machines was based on evidence of the new machine's superiority.  nothing to revise just read and give response