Black and brown people are more prone to commit crimes than any…

Question Black and brown people are more prone to commit crimes than any… Black and brown people are more prone to commit crimes than any other group, as though these groups were predisposed to the performance of criminal activities. There is some evidence to back up some of these claims, but there is also evidence to back up some of these claims based on research that shows that while African Americans and Hispanics make up about 12.5 and 15 percent of the population, respectively, these groups have a disproportionate number of violent crimes in the United States; 5.8 times higher for African Americans and 2.7 times higher for Hispanics. There is a link to an external site on the BJS website that provides a copy of the CV18.pdf file. (www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cv18.pdf (Links to an external site.))Using these data alone, it’s simple to conclude that black and brown people are more likely to engage in criminal activity than other groups of people. However, as Washington Post journalist Radley Balko reminds out:”[G]This can be said without resorting to bigotry, given the correlation between poverty and crime. As a result of centuries of institutionalized racism, [people of color] are more likely to be impoverished, which makes them more inclined to commit crimes.” Balko goes on to explain, “Because many cops assume criminality in people of color, they search for evidence more thoroughly, which can lead to more arrests. They’re more likely to arrest a person of color for “resisting” or “mouthing off.” In doing so, the arrestee has a criminal record, which limits his or her opportunities in the future. People become desperate and turn to illegal means of income when the avenues for earning a legitimate life begin to narrow.”History professor Khalil Gibran Muhammad claims in his book The Condemnation of Blackness that the extensive use of “race data” aims to make a long-term relationship between blackness and criminality. [Black and brown] people’s inherent penchant for violence became the most persistent justification for sustained discrimination and disparity. The “street of neighborhood” crime index in urban areas is only marginally different when comparing crime among the three largest racial groups in the country when we look at community and neighborhood statistics that have emerged in the last decade; nonetheless (White Index – 20, Black Index -22, Hispanic Index -20.5).While statistical abnormalities, outliers, and variances must be taken into consideration, the overwhelming body of data supports the assumption that poverty and crime are inextricably linked. Many studies have shown that poverty, rather than race, is a more reliable predictor of criminal behavior. Decreases in neighborhood poverty tend to have equal effects on violent crime reductions for both white and black and brown areas, according to a study done by researchers Lance Hannon and Robert DeFina. (https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1300/J134v09n03 03?journalCode=wpov20 (This is a link to another website.)Examining actions taken by various iterations of the U.S. government, such as the 3/5ths compromise, Jim Crow laws, and a myriad of laws prohibiting people of color from accessing the same economic mobility as their white counterparts, do you believe this government created a system of economic disparity? What’s the point? As a result, why do you think the government enables these socioeconomic barriers to persist if they are producing poverty and increasing the chance of criminal behavior in all communities? Even if poverty was reduced and crime rates decreased as a result, wouldn’t abating these economic hurdles benefit everyone?Don’t forget to cite your sources, whether they’re from the text or the lecture, to back up your assertions. In order to back up your argument, please cite any external sources you used. Arts & Humanities English ENG 001 Share QuestionEmailCopy link Comments (0)