Assignment Scenarios Ethical Scenario 1: Should I Call EMTS? by…

Question Answered step-by-step Assignment Scenarios Ethical Scenario 1: Should I Call EMTS? by… Assignment ScenariosEthical Scenario 1: Should I Call EMTS? by Rebecca Bivona-GuttadauroIt had been a long second week of freshman year. Roommates Sally and Morgan were ready for the weekend. On Friday night, they heard about an upcoming party and decided to check it out. The beer was plentiful, and even though they were underage, Sally and Morgan were welcome to drink as much as they wanted.As the night progressed, Morgan, who had very little experience with alcohol in high school, started to feel sick, so Sally helped her back to the dorm. When they got to the dorm bathroom, Morgan passed out next to the sink. Sally wasn’t sure what she should do. She had heard that there were EMTs (Emergency Medical Technicians) on campus to help in this situation. But she’d also heard that when you called the EMTs, you got fined and “written up.” She didn’t want to get in trouble or to make trouble for Morgan, but she thought her friend might be really ill.Ethical Scenario 2: The Dealer in the Next Room by Rebecca Bivona-GuttadauroIsaac moved off campus his sophomore year into an apartment with his friend Jason. Isaac and Jason met in their dorm during freshman year. Isaac always thought Jason seemed like a really cool guy until he discovered that Jason was into cocaine. Not only was Jason a user; he also distributed cocaine to others on campus. Isaac doesn’t want to rat Jason out because they’re friends, but Isaac doesn’t want to run the risk of being kicked out of his apartment, or worse, going to jail.Should Isaac confront Jason and tell him that he knows he has been using and selling cocaine? Should Isaac tell a school counselor? the police?Ethical Scenario 3: Facebook Gossip or Cyberbullying by Miriam SchulmanPaige, a college freshman, needed to put the finishing touches on a political science paper that was due at 11. After her 9 a.m. class, she returned to her room in the residence hall to check the footnotes, but when she unlocked the door, her roommate Cheyenne was in bed with the comforter pulled up above her head.Paige flicked on the light. It wasn’t her problem that Cheyenne was such a party girl. She hadn’t come home the night before, and that was hardly the first time. She decided to ignore Cheyenne and opened her laptop to begin her work. But when she started typing, Cheyenne growled at her to go somewhere else.Paige had told some friends to come by her room before class, and now she had to let them know she wouldn’t be there. On her way out of the residence hall, she posted a new status to her Facebook: “Cheyenne (AKA the skank) is sleeping it off in the room. I’ll be in the library.”By the time she reopened her laptop, her friend Ivy had commented on her status: “That girl is going to be pregnant before midterms.” And Leanne followed with lol.Paige was astonished when she got back from dinner that night to be approached by Tara, the Resident Fellow on her floor. Tara said she wanted to talk with Paige about cyberbullying Cheyenne.Do you think Paige was engaged in cyberbullying? If so, do you think the university should get involved  Ethical Scenario 4: Editing Your Child’s Paper: Unfair Advantage?Open the link below to hear the scenariohttps://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=7834713 Ethical Scenario 5: Is it OK to Hype Your Swag? (Buzz Markeing)Open the link below to hear the scenariohttps://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=6364284Review this entire document BEFORE attempting the assignment. Your response should identify your claim, supportive evidence, and reasoning. Your paper should be at least one page, but not exceed three pages. The best response will explain which of the Five Sources of Ethical Standards is guiding your response. More information may be found in the Guide to Ethical Decision Making on the learning path for this week…………………………………………………………………………………………………….Five Sources of Ethical Standards The Utilitarian ApproachSome ethicists emphasize that the ethical action is the one that provides the most good or does the least harm, or, to put it another way, produces the greatest balance of good over harm. The ethical corporate action, then, is the one that produces the greatest good and does the least harm for all who are affected — customers, employees, shareholders, the community, and the environment. Ethical warfare balances the good achieved in ending terrorism with the harm done to all parties through death, injuries, and destruction.The utilitarian approach deals with consequences; it tries both to increase the good done and to reduce the harm done. The Rights ApproachOther philosophers and ethicists suggest that the ethical action is the one that best protects and respects the moral rights of those affected. This approach starts from the belief that humans have a dignity based on their human nature per se or on their ability to choose freely what they do with their lives. On the basis of such dignity, they have a right to be treated as ends and not merely as means to other ends. The list of moral rights — including the rights to make one’s own choices about what kind of life to lead, to be told the truth, not to be injured, to a degree of privacy, and so on — is widely debated; some now argue that non-humans have rights, too. Also, it is often said that rights imply duties — in particular, the duty to respect others’ rights. The Fairness or Justice ApproachAristotle and other Greek philosophers have contributed the idea that all equals should be treated equally. Today we use this idea to say that ethical actions treat all human beings equally-or if unequally, then fairly based on some standard that is defensible. We pay people more based on their harder work or the greater amount that they contribute to an organization and say that is fair. But there is a debate over CEO salaries that are hundreds of times larger than the pay of others; many ask whether the huge disparity is based on a defensible standard or whether it is the result of an imbalance of power and hence is unfair.  The Common Good ApproachThe Greek philosophers have also contributed the notion that life in community is a good in itself and our actions should contribute to that life. This approach suggests that the interlocking relationships of society are the basis of ethical reasoning and that respect and compassion for all others — especially the vulnerable — are requirements of such reasoning. This approach also calls attention to the common conditions that are important tothe welfare of everyone. This may be a system of laws, effective police and fire departments, health care, a public educational system, or even public recreational areas. The Virtue ApproachA very ancient approach to ethics is that ethical actions ought to be consistent with certain ideal virtues that provide for the full development of our humanity. These virtues are dispositions and habits that enable us to act according to the highest potential of our character and on behalf of values like truth and beauty. Honesty, courage, compassion, generosity, tolerance, love, fidelity, integrity, fairness, self-control, and prudence are all examples of virtues. Virtue ethics asks of any action, “What kind of person will I become if I do t his?” or “Is this action consistent with my acting at my best?” Begin by briefly introducing a description of the ethical issue presented in the scenario you selected.  (offer a brief summary) long answers Review the assignment details in the document attached below in the learning path and select ONE (1)  scenario on which to talk about. Could this decision or situation be damaging? Who might be helped, who might be harmed?Is this issue about more than what is legal or what is most helpful?What are the relevant facts of the case? What facts are not known? Do I know enough to make a good decision?What individuals and groups have an important stake in the decision?       Are some concerns more important? Why?  Evaluate possible options by asking the following questions: Which option will produce the most good and do the least harm? (TheUtilitarian Approach)Which option best respects the rights of all who have a stake? (TheRights Approach)Which option treats people equally or proportionately? (The Justice Approach)Which option best serves the community as a whole, not just somemembers? (The Common Good Approach)Which option leads me to act as the sort of person I want to be? (TheVirtue Approach)  Remember to identify your claim, supportive evidence, and reasoning. Include a discussion about which of the Five Ethical Standards is influencing your argument and explain why it is effective in your analysis.  Arts & Humanities Philosophy PHI 130 Share QuestionEmailCopy link Comments (0)