As the world progresses things tend to evolve. Roads have gone from…

Question Answered step-by-step As the world progresses things tend to evolve. Roads have gone from… As the world progresses things tend to evolve. Roads have gone from dirt to cobblestone to concrete. Wheels for cars have been upgraded from wood to synthetic rubber. There are advancements in life every day and now it is time to make another adjustment to the work week. The 4-day work week is the wave of the future. With a shorter week employees will be more focused on timelines while also being more energized since they will have had more time in their personal lives. In major cities and densely populated downtown areas there will be less traffic which means less carbon pollution. Another beautiful side of the 4-day work week would be families being able to spend more time together.The number of studies on why the 4-day work week should be considered is staggering with them all listing a plethora of reasons but must coming back to one, an increase in productivity. Stanford has an amazing study called “The Relationship Between Hours Worked and Productivity” where they use a math equation that shows a decrease in productivity as hours worked increase. However, it does not take a mathematician or genius to see the effects of burn out on the population. A 4-day work week would allow people to take an extra day off to rest and relax or to take care of things like doctor’s appointments. With people being able to use this extra time they would not be so racked by anxiety and the idea of returning to work would not have a dreadful stigma. With this refreshed mindset people can enter the workspace and power through their responsibilities with shortened timelines. One would think that having less time to work would mean that tasks would not be completed but with less time that also means people are not able to put things off. In an article Colin Duff of Owllabs wrote that Perpetual Guardian, a trust management from New Zealand, reported that “after switching to a four-day workweek with a normal week’s salary, they reported a 20% gain in employee productivity. They also saw a 27% reduction in work stress levels and a 45% increase in work-life balance. In seeing the results, they decided to make the policy permanent.” Another great point in that same article states that with the extra time people would have they would be more inclined to boost domestic tourism. This would mean that people would be active more in their communities circulating more and stimulating the economy. CO2 emissions is another factor that the 4-day work week would influence. During the first year of covid-19 lockdowns, we saw carbon dioxide emissions fall by 5.4%. While a 4-day work week would not have the same effects as a lockdown it would still be something that would help to curb the ever-rising CO2 problem. According to a finding published by Environmental Protection Agency, “the average passenger vehicle emits about 404 grams of CO2 per mile.” Now if you couple that with a poll done by ABC News which states that the average American commutes 16 miles one way. The math would say that ends up being well over 10,000 grams (about 22.05 lb.) per commuter. Finally, if you add the data from an article by Felix Richter on Statista that states 76% of Americans use a car for commuting to and from work. Add all of this and the numbers start to become astounding. All this information goes to prove that a 4-day work week would also have a strong effect on the Earth and the climate crisis. Often people talk about how important family is or how they wish they could spend more time to with loved ones, well a 4-day work week would help to make that a reality. Too often in the age of the computer and social media does a kid end up being raised and influenced by what they see on Instagram or Twitter with the parents having no clue what is going on in their kid’s life. If you shortened the work week it would give those parents more time to spend with their kids and get a better understanding of their life. Reducing the work week would also help to combat the rising prices of childcare. Sterling Price of ValuePenguin.com states that average hourly wage for a babysitter is a range from $14.08 per hour to $21.98 per hour. This potentially saves families at minimum $100 a week, if two parent families stagger their extra day off then that number could go up to $200 a week. To further put those numbers into perspective. Milena of Balancingeverything.com states in article that “In the United States, the monthly cost of feeding one person is about $342.11. The average cost of food per day per person is $11.04.” By those numbers that is around 9 meals worth of money that can be used exactly for that, feeding a family. More time with family equates to a healthier home dynamic. For those without kids please keep in mind that spending time with loved ones is not just for family members, loved ones can be friends too.  All said and done the effects of a 4-day work week are overwhelmingly positive. The UK Labor Party has adopted the 4-day work week. The Netherlands, the 5th happiest country in the world, has an average work week of 32 hours according to Statisa.com. With companies around the world trying the reduced work week and finding success it is time to take a more serious look at this and consider moving to this as a standard. The lasting effects on better employee mental health, helping combat C02 emissions and having people more invested in their families all seem like practical reasons to make the switch.   my question is What is the topic? If you can’t tell what the topic is, then say you can’t find it.Does the author include a paragraph that addresses the counterargument? Is this clear?What stands out to you as a strength in this paper?Does the writer include an effective thesis?Are all claims supported by facts like examples and statistics? If any claims are not supported, point them out in the draft. Are there any logical fallacies? If so, point them out on the draft.Are there in-text citations in the paragraph? If so, are they correct? If any are not correct, point them out in the draft.Is there a Works Cited page? If so, does it begin one page after the paragraph, and are the citations correct? If anything is wrong, point it out in the draft.Is the paper logically organized? Is the flow of ideas in the paper smooth? Are there places in the paper that need better paragraph organization or transitions? If so, where?Do you notice any issues with grammar or spelling? (No need to correct errors, but you are welcome to give suggestions.)Leave at least two suggestions for the writer to improve this paper. Arts & Humanities Writing ENGL 1301 Share QuestionEmailCopy link Comments (0)