Article – What matters to women and healthcare providers in…

Question Answered step-by-step Article – What matters to women and healthcare providers in… Article – What matters to women and healthcare providers in relation to interventions for the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage: A qualitative systematic review Critique the above Qualitative Research Article using the following rubric. Include all section/bullet points in the critique you are providing. Aspect of the Report Critiquing Questions Score and Feedback Abstract (1 points) ·        What components should the abstract include in a scholarly research article? What does the abstract include? Explain what this means to you.  Research problem and purpose of studyLiterature review(2 points) ·        Were these items provided in the abstract and introduction of the article? ·        Identify the problem and the purpose of the study.·       Also, provide the problem of the study in format of a PICOT question.·        Identify what is known and not known about the problem. Is there a literature review section? How many articles were used? What were the findings in the literature?   Method: (5 points)Research design and research traditionSample and settingData collection procedures Credibility ·        Is the identified research tradition (if any) congruent with the methods used to collect and analyze data?·        Was an adequate amount of time spent in the field or with study participants?·        Was there evidence of reflexivity in the design?·        Was the group or population of interest adequately described? Were the setting and sample described in sufficient detail?·        Was the best possible method of sampling used to enhance information richness and address the needs of the study?·        Was the sample size adequate? Was saturation achieved?·        Were the methods of gathering data appropriate? Were data gathered through two or more methods to achieve triangulation?·        Did the researcher ask the right questions or make the right observations?·        Do data collection and recording procedures appear appropriate?·        Were data collected in a manner that minimized bias? Were the people who collected data appropriately trained?·        Did the researchers use strategies to enhance the trustworthiness/integrity of the study, and were those strategies adequate?·        Do the researchers’ clinical, substantive, or methodologic qualifications and experience enhance confidence in the findings and their interpretation? Results (5 points)Data analysisFindingsLimitationsSummary assessment ·        Was the data analysis strategy compatible with the research tradition and with the nature and type of data gathered?·        Did the analysis yield an appropriate “product” (e.g., a theory, taxonomy, thematic pattern, etc.)?·        Did the analytic procedures suggest the possibility of biases?·        Were the findings effectively summarized, with good use of excerpts and supporting arguments?·        Do the themes adequately capture the meaning of the data? Does it appear that the researcher satisfactorily conceptualized the themes or patterns in the data?·        Did the analysis yield an insightful, provocative, authentic, and meaningful picture of the phenomenon under investigation?·        Identify the limitations (if there were any). ·        Do the study findings appear to be trustworthy—do you have confidence in the truth value of the results?·        Does the study contribute any meaningful evidence that can be used in nursing practice or that is useful to the nursing discipline?   Does the above article answer the following PICO(T) question?In women age 18-40 (P), how does having a Cesarean Section (I) compare to having a Vaginal Birth (C) affect the woman’s chance of hemorrhaging (O) within 6 weeks of giving birth (T)?  Health Science Science Nursing NUR 360REASEAR Share QuestionEmailCopy link Comments (0)