1. Use active voice Gopen and Swan suggest that science writers use…
Question Answered step-by-step 1. Use active voice Gopen and Swan suggest that science writers use… 1. Use active voiceGopen and Swan suggest that science writers use active voice to improve clarity. Active voice creates clear and direct sentences, which can be easier for readers to understand. For example, “The sun rises in the east” is clearer than “The east is where the sun rises.” 2. Use specific and concrete languageGopen and Swan also recommend that science writers use specific and concrete language. This means using precise terms and avoiding generalities. For example, “The sun is a star” is more specific and concrete than “The sun is a big ball of fire.” 3. Use short sentencesAnother suggestion from Gopen and Swan is to use short sentences. Short sentences are easier to read and understand than long ones. For example, “The sun is a star” is shorter and easier to understand than “The sun, which is a star, is one of the bodies in our solar system.” 4. Use parallel structureGopen and Swan suggest that science writers use parallel structure to improve clarity. Parallel structure means using the same grammatical form for two or more ideas that are of equal importance. For example, “The sun is a star and the moon is a satellite” is parallel, while “The sun is a star and the moon is a rock orbiting Earth” is not. 5. Use transitional words and phrasesFinally, Gopen and Swan recommend that science writers use transitional words and phrases. Transitional words and phrases can help to connect ideas and make writing flow more smoothly. For example, “The sun is a star. However, the moon is a satellite.”When science writers follow these suggestions, their writing will be clearer and easier for readers to understand. For each suggestion, Paraphrase the suggestion the authors give in the article. Finally, apply all of the rules to improve the following paragraph:Large earthquakes along a given fault segment do not occur at randomintervals because it takes time to accumulate the strain energy for the rupture. The rates atwhich tectonic plates move and accumulate strain at their boundaries are approximatelyuniform. Therefore, in first approximation, one may expect that large ruptures of the samefault segment will occur at approximately constant time intervals. If subsequent mainshocks have different amounts of slip across the fault, then the recurrence time may vary,and the basic idea of periodic mainshocks must be modified. For great plate boundaryruptures the length and slip often vary by a factor of 2. Along the southern segment of theSan Andreas fault the recurrence interval is 145 years with variations of several decades.The smaller the standard deviation of the average recurrence interval, the more specificcould be the long-term prediction of a future mainshock. Arts & Humanities Writing ENGL 128 Share QuestionEmailCopy link Comments (0)
