The written video critique is worth 20%, must be done individually…The written video critique is worth 20%, must be done individually…
Question The written video critique is worth 20%, must be done individually… The written video critique is worth 20%, must be done individually and include the following.Identify three (3) critical elements within the process of the procedure that were performed well according to best practice recommendations.Provide evidence-based rationale for each of the identified critical elements using peer-reviewed journal articles and/or textbooks. Citations and references should be in accordance with the APA 7th Edition Guidelines.Identify three (3) areas for improvement in the video produced and considerations for future practice in the clinical environment.List the search terms used in your database search for the evidence-based literature.Tips for writing a critique Download Tips for writing a critique Rubric Video Critique CriteriaRatingsPts This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeCriterion 1Critical principles highlightedMay be in the following areas (dependant on the scenario)-Accurate technique-Patient safety-Infection control-Body mechanics/technique-Communication-Patient centered care-Respectful and supportive of diverse backgrounds 5 to >4.0 PtsHigh DistinctionStrong and relevant choice of three (3) critical elements with a specific description of the critical element according to best practice guidelines 4 to >3.0 PtsDistinctionAbove average and relevant choice of critical with moderate description of the critical element according to best practice guidelines element 3 to >2.5 PtsCreditWeak choice of critical element according to best practice guidelines 2.5 to >2.0 PtsPassSatisfactory choice of critical element with moderate description of the critical element according to best practice guidelines element 2 to >0 PtsNXWeak choice of critical element according to best practice guidelines 5 pts This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeCriterion 2Future learning 5 to >4.0 PtsHigh DistinctionDemonstrates excellent understanding and insight into relevant area for improvement in technique identified or an area for further consideration in clinical practice identified 4 to >3.0 PtsDistinctionDemonstrates sound understanding and insight for improvement in technique identified or an area for further consideration in clinical practice identified 3 to >2.5 PtsCreditDemonstrates above average understanding towards relevant areas for improvement in technique identified or an area for further consideration in clinical practice identified 2.5 to >2.0 PtsPassMedium relevance for improvement in technique identified or an area for further consideration in clinical practice identified 2 to >0 PtsNXPoor relevance for improvement in technique identified or an area for further consideration in clinical practice identified 5 pts This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeCriterion 3Literature search information and Referencing 5 to >4.0 PtsHigh DistinctionAdvanced search terms used, and 3 or more appropriate databases searced Completely correct: – In-text referencing – Reference list 4 to >3.0 PtsDistinctionStrong search terms used and 3 databases identified in search One (1 ) or two (2) corrections are needed 3 to >2.5 PtsCreditGood search terms used, and appropriate databases searched Three (3) to four (4) corrections are needed 2.5 to >2.0 PtsPassSatisfactory search terms used and databases identified in search Five (5) or more corrections are needed 2 to >0 PtsNXMinimal relevant search terms used and weak/non-academic databases identified in search Six (6) or more corrections are needed OR No referencing included for in-text OR reference list 5 pts This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeCriterion 4Evidence based rationale for each critical principle 5 to >4.0 PtsHigh DistinctionProvides: strong evidenced based explanation of why the critical element is important with outstanding use of peer-reviewed journal articles and/or textbooks to support points 4 to >3.0 PtsDistinctionProvides: Very good evidenced based explanation of why the critical element is important with excellent use of peer-reviewed journal articles and/or textbooks to support points 3 to >2.5 PtsCreditProvides: Above average evidenced based explanation of why the critical element is important with good use of peer-reviewed journal articles and/or textbooks to support points 2.5 to >2.0 PtsPassProvides: Satisfactory evidenced based explanation of why the critical element is important with some use of p reviewed journal articles and/or textbooks to support points 2 to >0 PtsNXProvides: Poor or absent evidenced based explanation of why the critical element is important with weak/no use of peer-reviewed journal articles and/or textbooks to support points 5 pts Total points: 20 Health Science Science Nursing NURSE 364JA Share QuestionEmailCopy link Comments (0)
