Porter’s Five Forces, an overview
Porter’s Five Competitive Forces were developed by Michael E. Porter in his 1980 book, Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. Since then, this tool has become an important method in analyzing an organizations industry structure in a strategic process. Corporate strategy should meet the opportunities and threats in the organizations external environment and should be based on an understanding of industry structures and the way they change. Porter’s Five Forces Analysis can provide valuable information for three aspects of corporate planning:
Statistical Analysis:
The Five Forces Analysis allows determining the attractiveness of an industry. It provides insights on profitability. Thus, it supports decisions about entry to or exit from an industry or a market segment. Moreover, the model can be used to compare the impact of competitive forces on their own organization against their impact on competitors. may have different options to react to changes in competitive forces from their different resources and competence’s. This may influence the structure of the whole industry.
Dynamical Analysis:
The Five Forces Analysis can reveal insights about the potential future attractiveness of the industry. Expected Political, Economic, Socio-demographic, Technological, Legal, and Environmental changes can influence the five competitive forces and thus have impact on industry structures. Useful tools to determine potential changes of competitive forces are scenarios.
Analysis of Options:
With the knowledge about intensity and power of competitive forces, organizations can develop options to influence them in a way that improves their own competitive position. The result could be a new strategic direction, new positioning, or differentiation for competitive products.
There are some assumptions that Porter makes with his Five Forces model:
- The first being that buyers, competitors, and suppliers are unrelated and do not interact and collude;
- The second is that the source of value is structural advantage and creates barriers to entry; And,
- Third, is that uncertainty is low, allowing participants in a market to plan for and respond to competitive behavior.
While Porter’s Five Forces is an effective and time-tested model, it has been criticized for failing to explain strategic alliances. In the 1990s, Yale School of Management professors Adam Brandenbuger and Bare Nalebuff created the idea of a sixth force, “complementors,” using the tools of game theory. In their model, complementors sell products and services that are best used in conjunction with a product or service from a competitor. Intel, which manufactures processors, and computer manufacturer Apple could be considered complementors in this model. More information can be found at Strategic CFO.
There are five competitive forces that shape every industry and every market. They determine the intensity of competition and the profitability and attractiveness of an industry. Corporate strategy should modify the competitive forces to improve the condition of the organization. Through the analysis, management can decide how to exploit certain characteristics in their industry.
The first is entry of competitors, or how easy or difficult is it for new entrants to start to compete, which barriers do exist.
The easier it is for new companies to enter the industry, the more cut-throat competition there will be. Factors that can limit the threat of new entrants are known as barriers to entry. Some examples include: Existing loyalty to major brands, incentives for using a particular buyer (such as frequent shopper programs), high fixed costs, scarcity of resources, government restrictions or legislation, entry protection (patents, rights, etc.), economies of product differences, brand equity, switching costs or sunk costs, capital requirements, access to distribution, absolute cost advantages, learning curve advantages, and expected retaliation by incumbents.
The second is the threat of substitutes, or how easy can our product or service be substituted, especially cheaper.
What is the likelihood that someone will switch to a competitive product or service? Because of the type of service, there are very few substitutes in other industries. If the cost of switching is low, then this poses to be a serious threat. Here are a few factors that can affect the threat of substitutes: buyer propensity to substitute, relative price performance of substitutes, buyer switching costs, perceived level of product differentiation, fad and fashion, and technology change and product innovation. The main issue is the similarity of substitutes. For example, if the price of coffee rises substantially, a coffee drinker is likely to switch over to a beverage like tea because the products are so similar. If substitutes are similar, then it can be viewed in the same light as a new entrant.
The third is the bargaining power of buyers, or how strong is the position of buyers and can they work together to order large volumes.
This is how much pressure customers can place on a business. If one customer has a large enough impact to affect a company’s margins and volumes, then they hold substantial power. Here are a few reasons that customers might have power: small number of buyers, purchases of large volumes, switching to another (competitive) product is simple, the product is not extremely important to the buyer, they can do without it for a period of time, customers are price sensitive, buyer concentration to firm concentration ratio, bargaining leverage, buyer volume, buyer switching costs relative to firm switching costs, buyer information availability, ability to backward integrate, availability of existing substitute products, buyer price sensitivity, and price of total purchase.
The fourth is the bargaining power of suppliers, or how strong is the position of sellers and are there many or only few potential suppliers and is there a monopoly.
This is how much pressure suppliers can place on a business. If one supplier has a large enough impact to affect a company’s margins and volumes, then they hold substantial power. Here are a few reasons that suppliers might have power: there are very few suppliers of a particular product, there are no substitutes, the product is extremely important to the buyer, they cannot do without it, the supplying industry has a higher profitability than the buying industry, supplier switching costs relative to firm switching costs, degree of differentiation of inputs, presence of substitute inputs, supplier concentration to firm concentration ratio, threat of forward integration by suppliers relative to the threat of backward integration by firms, and cost of inputs relative to selling price of the product.
The last force is the rivalry among the existing players, or is there a strong competition between the existing players and is one player very dominant or all equal in strength and size.
Highly competitive industries generally earn low returns because the cost of competition is high. A highly competitive market might result from: many players of about the same size, no dominant firm, little differentiation between competitor’s products and services, a mature industry with very little growth, and companies can only grow by stealing customers away from competitors. For many industries, this is the major determinant of the competitiveness of the industry. Sometimes rivals compete aggressively and sometimes rivals compete in non-price dimensions such as innovation, marketing, etc.
The list below provides ideas on how to reduce the power of the five forces to negatively impact a firm. Remember: The forces are in the market but the market impacts a firm’s operations! Not all of these approaches will specifically apply in a given scenario but they are among the concepts leaders and managers typically consider when attempting to improve their firm’s short and long-term possibilities.
- Bargaining Power of Suppliers
- Partnering
- Supply chain management
- Supply chain training
- Increase dependency
- Build knowledge of supplier costs and methods
- Take over a supplier
- Reducing the Treat of New Entrants
- Increase minimum efficient scales of operations
- Create a marketing / brand image (loyalty as a barrier)
- Patents, protection of intellectual property
- Alliances with linked products / services
- Tie up with suppliers
- Tie up with distributors
- Retaliation tactics
- Reducing the Competitive Rivalry between Existing Players
- Avoid price competition
- Differentiate your product
- Buy out competition
- Reduce industry over-capacity
- Focus on different segments
- Communicate with competitors
- Reducing the Bargaining Power of Customers
- Partnering
- Supply chain management
- Increase loyalty
- Increase incentives and value added
- Move purchase decision away from price
- Cut put powerful intermediaries (go directly to customer)
- Reducing the Threat of Substitutes
- Legal actions (which may include legislation or other government actions)
- Increase switching costs
- Alliances
- Customer surveys to learn about their preferences
- Enter substitute market and influence from within
- Accentuate differences (real or perceived)